Summary Of Lifting The Veil By Rabindranath Tagore

Lifting the veil: society’s self-perception in Rabindranath Tagore’s short stories. Chapter- I (Introduction: Exploring new possibilities )----- â€Å"This world appears to us as an individual, and not merely as a bundle of invisible forces. For this, as everybody knows, it is greatly indebted to our senses and our mind. This apparent world is man`s world. It has taken its special features of shape, colour and movement from the peculiar range and qualities of our perception. It is what our sense limits have specially acquired and built for us and walled up†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦This world, which takes its form in the mould of man`s perception, still remains only as the partial world of his senses and mind. It is like a guest and not like a kinsman. It becomes†¦show more content†¦Thus, characters, voices or attributes in a literary work are interpreted as the full and final pictures of the society. ‘Self’ is a reference by an individual to the same indivi dual person. It describes essential qualities that constitute a person s uniqueness or essential being. It can be considered the basic nature of a person which endures that ‘being’ which is the source of consciousness for an individual s thoughts and actions, and unifies ‘consciousness’ over time. It plays an integral part in human motivation, cognition, affect, and social identity and constantly evolves due to the complexities of cultures and societies. It is dependent on the culture that the ‘self’ has been situated in.â€Å"It can be redefined as a dynamic, responsive process that structures neural pathways according to past and present environments including material, social, and spiritual aspects† (Mead’s ‘Self, Culture, Society Class’, 2015). P- It is shaped by our social interactions and our physical environments. An individual s social interactions occur when they’re in a specific society or culture. If these individuals grow up in a certain culture,

Unit 313. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in Dementia...

PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE RECORD QCF Unit †¦313†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. Candidate Name †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ Use this form to record details of activities (tick as appropriate) Observed by your assessor ( Work product ( Seen by Expert Witness ( APL ( Seen by witness ( Simulation ( Self-reflective account ( Projects/Assignment ( |Unit |Assessment |Performance Evidence | | |criteria | | | | |†¦show more content†¦However, this number is likely to be an under | | | |estimate and the true figure may be up | | | |to three times higher. Data on the numbers of young onset cases are based on referrals to services, which | | | |significantly underestimates the numbers, because not all those with young onset dementia seek help early in | | | |the disease course. | | | |There are often long delays in younger people with dementia receiving a diagnosis. Improved diagnostic | | | |services would help people get access to care more quickly and easily. | | | |It is important that younger people with dementia have access to a range of specialised services that address | | | |their particular needs. There is currently a lack of specialised services to meet the needs of people with | | | |dementia under 65. | | | |Services must be age inclusive, they should be based on need, not age. It is essential that commissionersShow MoreRelatedNVQ 3 Equality Diversity And Inclusion In Dementia Care Practice Assignment1696 Words   |  7 PagesDEM 313 Equality, diversity and inclusion in dementia care practice 1.1 Explain why it is important to recognise and respect an individual’s heritage An individual’s heritage is about his culture, history or personal experiences it is important to recognise and respect them because it is what makes him individual and unique. If we know them we provide a person centre care and focus on individual’s choices and preferences, he will then feel valued and included. For example Muslim doesn’t eat porkRead More_x000C_Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis355457 Words   |  1422 PagesGraphing Calculator Explorations 272 6 Probability 279 6.1 Chance Experiments and Events 279 6.2 Deï ¬ nition of Probability 288 ââ€"   Contents ix 6.3 Basic Properties of Probability 295 6.4 Conditional Probability 302 6.5 Independence 313 6.6 Some General Probability Rules 323 6.7 Estimating Probabilities Empirically Using Simulation 335 Activity 6.1 Kisses 347 Activity 6.2 A Crisis for European Sports Fans? 347 Activity 6.3 The â€Å"Hot Hand† in Basketball 347 Graphing Calculator Explorations

Positive Case for Compatibilism and the Free Will Problem Free Essays

The concept of free will has been a point of contention for philosophers for several decades. One of the reasons for these diverging viewpoints is the debate on how exactly to define the word free. It would be misleading to attribute any one exclusive idea to the concept. We will write a custom essay sample on Positive Case for Compatibilism and the Free Will Problem or any similar topic only for you Order Now However it is agreed neutrally that it is an exercise of an individual’s behavior in order for him to take moral responsibility for his actions. A person who takes on his moral responsibility is one who can chose to make decisions that are morally right or wrong. Thus, the blame or reward for the outcome of the decision falls squarely on his shoulders. It is understood that free will is an essential component of these decisions. Conceptually it can be understood how the pre-determined nature of the universe can casually affect our decisions to such a point where free will is no longer applicable. However the theory of compatibilism states that free will and determinism are not mutually exclusive. That they can exist together without conflict, that an individual can exercise free will when faced with pre-determined factors. This topic will analyze, synthesize and evaluate arguments related to the problems associated with the concept of free will and how compatibilism offers a solution to these problems (McKenna, 2004). In order to understand how compatibilism acts as a solution to the free will problem it is first important to understand that there are several concepts used attributed to free will. When these concepts are conjoined to others they invariably create several contradictions. In order to avoid these problems it is important to consider the classic formulation of free will which informs us of then several key factors associated with it. The first is that the individual has a choice to act in more than one way in a situation. However any action taken by an individual qualifies as an event with various causes that effect the individual’s decision. Thus, the cause is casually determined and the individual cannot act in any way other than what is pre-determined by these factors. It should be noted that the existence of free will is tantamount upon the fact that the individual has no extraneous source compelling him to act. Rather all his decisions making is contingent upon his own compulsion to follow his decisions in the face of alternate possibilities. It is only in such a case that freedom to assume moral responsibility exists (McKenna, 2004). John Martin Fincher is a philosopher who is responsible for refining the viewpoint that suggested that decisions which constitute the free will of an individual can be affected by a number of reasons. This proves why certain people can have different reactions to the same situation and rules out those individuals who have compulsive or neurotic behavior. The refined viewpoint by Martin Fincher is known as the reasons-responsiveness theory which states that even though there are considerations which may affect the decisions of an individual. The decision made it can still be considered to be an individual free will since the choice made is rationally based according to the factors affecting the individual (McKenna, 2004). Another concept attributed to Compatibilism is P.F Strawson’s concept of moral responsibility. This is similar to Hume’s concept and says that the practice of holding an individual morally responsible for his or her own actions is formed on the basis of both emotional and societal structures. He said that the existence of these critical responses is part of human nature defined by our basic emotional natures and cannot be abandoned, thus the fact that determinism affects our moral responsibility does not hold ground. However in certain cases an individual can choose to give up their moral judgments in favor of rationalizing the individuals actions can exist as well but only in the cases where the actions gains favors or losses to human life (Kane, 2002 p. 516-521). There are of course objections to the theories of compatibilism. One of the principle arguments for incompatibilism comes from Carl Ginet. The argument given by him states that the power of an individual to affect change does not extend to factors such as those of nature that are by their very nature unchangeable. And if a certain fact affects a person directly and the consequences of that fact exist than the person will be affected by the consequences of that fact as well. Thus in the face of these facts determinism becomes true and since no one can change the facts that cause the situation, no one can affect the future (McKenna, 2004). How to cite Positive Case for Compatibilism and the Free Will Problem, Papers

Legal Environment of Business Corporations and Securities Legislation

Question: Discuss about the Legal Environment of Business for Corporations and Securities Legislation. Answer: Registration of Company Share Register To: The Board of Directors of the Company From: The Company SecretarySubject: The Share Register Under the corporations act, it is required that the company should have one member at least who is termed as being the shareholder of the company (Latimer, 1996). These shareholders may either be under section 120 of the Corporations Act 2001 (The Act) those who are incorporating or forming the company firsthand or those who have been issued the companys shares after the same has been incorporated or those who acquire those shares which to them have been transferred and these shareholders shall have to enter their names in the "Register of Members" or the "Share Register" or the "Register of the Shareholders" as provided under Section 231 of The Act (1994 Australian corporations securities legislation, 1994). Attached format of Share Register: Constitution Corporations Act Company Limited by Shares Rules of XYZ Company Private LimitedACN 123 456 789 Preliminary The replaceable rules and this Constitution shall be jointly applicable to the Company. General The name of the Company is XYZ Private Limited. The members liability in this company is limited. The Corporations Act 2001 provisions with respect to the replaceable rules shall be applicable to the company wherever the same has been included specifically herein. In the places where there has been the specific exclusion of the replaceable rules, the same will stand specifically excluded (Law of companies in Australia, 1986). Interpretation Unless other required by the context the phrases and words mentioned below shall have the meaning as mentioned below:Act means the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth.);ASIC means the Australian Securities and Investment Commission;Board of Directors means the Board of Directors of the Company;Common Seal means the companys common seal (if any);Company Secretary means the person who has been appointed by the company for the performance of duties as the companys secretary;Constitution means this Constitution and any amendments/addendums to the constitution thereto;General Meeting means the companys member meeting;Replaceable Rules means the rules which are referred to in the Act as the replaceable rules.Registered Office means for the time being the registered office of the Company;Register Shareholders means registration of the members in pursuant to the provisions of the Act.Section means wherever the term section has been used in this act it would mean a section of the Act. Preference Shares The Company may subject to the Act issue preference shares including preference shares that are redeemable. These preference shares are to be issued on the terms on which they are or at the company's or holder's option and shall be liable to be redeemed whether the company has the profit or not (Gillies, 2004). These preferences are to confer upon the holders of these shares the right of converting it into ordinary shares on the basis and if it is determined by the Board at the time when the preference shares are being issued (Australian corporations securities legislation 2005, 2005). There shall be conferring on the holder by the preference shares the right of receiving the profits that the Company avails for preferential dividends dividend on the basis that the Board shall determine at the time when the preference shares are issued; There shall be participation of the preference shares along with the ordinary shares when the Board declares the dividends to the extent and if the Board at the time when the preference shares are issued determines (Australian corporations securities legislation 2005, 2005); and At the time of issuing of preference shares the Board may determine that the preferential are cumulative and if cumulative to the extent to which it shall be cumulative The holders of the preference share are to be conferred with (a) the redemption right, and wherein there is a winding up priority for payment in case as compared to any other class of shares (Australian corporations legislation, 2010); and The right of being given the priority with respect to the payment of any dividend over any other class of shares, to those dividends which are preferential in nature.There is no conferring of any further rights to the holders of the preference shares by the preference shares for participating in the profits or the assets of the company (Brophy Gupta, 1976); Voting Right The rights that are conferred to the preference shareholders is same as that which are conferred to the Ordinary Shareholders for attending of any general meeting of the members of the Company and only in the following situations and in no other situations can there be a right of vote in the members general meeting (Davis, 1996): Where there are an unpaid Preference Shares with respect to a Dividend during a period in which there is a meeting called; Where there is a proposal for reducing the share capital of the Company; With respect to a resolution which is for the buy-back agreements terms being approved with respect to the Company; Where there is proposal which would affect the rights which have been attached with the Preference Shares (Christensen, Kent, Stewart, 2010); Where there is proposal for winding up of the Company; and When the company is being wound up; Voting Rights If there is a permit for voting under the clause 2.6 then in that case each of the holders of Preference Shares will have the rights mentioned below with respect to their Preference Shares in the general meeting of the members: One vote will be given to per shareholders at the time of show of hands; and In the case of a poll, per fully paid Preference Share shall have one full vote and partly paid Preference Shareholder shall have the fraction of the vote which is proportionate to the amount which has been paid for issuing of the Preference Share, which is partly paid. Accounts and Reports: The right of receiving audited accounts, notices and reports shall be same as that of the holder of Ordinary Shares. Prevailing of Preference Share ProvisionsThe provisions of preference shares as described in the Part 2 shall prevail over all the other provisions of the Constitution to the extent of there being an inconsistency. Section 124Under section 124 of the Corporations Act 2001 (The Act), the companies, have been empowered specifically for borrowing money, granting of security for these loan(s) and issuing of shares. Under the section 124, the companies have also been empowered to the issue of shares and also to have the option over such shares (Corporations Act 2001 reprinted on 16 June 2006 (taking into account amendments up to and including those made by Act No. 17, 2006), 2006). For facilitation of the companys operations in a manner that is effective decision has to be made by the managers of the company and also these decisions are required to be implemented with respect to the companys need for capital. These decisions include decisions regarding the amount of the capital which the company requires and the source of capital which would prove to be most effective for the company. If the companies want to expand the opportunities with respect to trading in the future, there will inevitably be a necessity for financing such operations either by way borrowing of funds directly through a financial institutions agency or by way of shares and issue such share or by way of debentures which are issued. This section provides for the company to be able to raise such capital ("CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 588MRecovery of compensation for loss resulting from insolvent trading", 2016).Section 129(1) The section 129(1) assumption is concerned with the constitution of the company and any of The Acts replaceable rules that are applicable (Latimer, 1996). It is provided under the section 129(1) that it may be assumed by an individual that the constitution of a company, if any, and any of the replaceable rules under The Acts provision that are applicable on the company have been complied with by the company ("CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 129Assumptions that can be made under section 128", 2016). The statutory espousal by the Section 129(1) of the CL IMR is represented. Under the principle of this section a person who is contracting with a given company and wherein the individual is dealing with the company in good faith it may be assumed by the individual that all such acts are within the constitution of the company and there has been a due and proper performance of all the powers, and there is no binding on such individual to enquiring whether there have been regular acts by the management which is internal (Pentony Lennard, 2000).Section 588M (3) Under this section the creditor in a manner as provided under the B subdivision however not in any other manner may recover directly from the director, for the debts which are due to such creditor, an amount being equal to the amount of damage or loss suffered by the creditor. The section 588M(3) provides invariably a right to the creditors for suing the director for compensation when it comes to a situation where there has been insolvent trading directly ("CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 588MRecovery of compensation for loss resulting from insolvent trading", 2016). Also in the even where the company undergoes liquidation and there has been a breach by the director under section 588M then pursuant to section 588M(3) of The Act the creditor of the company, with the liquidator of the companys consent, may from the director of the company, as a debt which shall be due to the company, recover an amount which amounts to the damage and loss which the creditors directors have suffered from the director (Symon, 2006). Such creditor directors should be those are a subject of the claims with respect to the companys insolvent trading and the defenses which have been set out under section 588H of The Act are available to them (Vermeesch Lindgren, 1992). Bibliography 1994 Australian corporations securities legislation. (1994). North Ryde, N.S.W. Australian corporations securities legislation 2005. (2005). North Ryde, N.S.W. Australian corporations securities legislation 2013. (2012). North Ryde, N.S.W. Australian corporations legislation. (2010). Chatswood, N.S.W. Australian national companies and securities legislation. (1982). North Ryde, N.S.W. Brophy, D. Gupta, L. (1976). Preference Shares and Company Finance. The Journal Of Finance, 31(5), 1528. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2326705 Brophy, D. Gupta, L. (1976). Preference Shares and Company Finance. The Journal Of Finance, 31(5), 1528. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2326705 Christensen, J., Kent, P., Stewart, J. (2010). Corporate Governance and Company Performance in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 20(4), 372-386. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00108.x Corporations ACT 2001. (2016). edu.au. Retrieved 24 May 2016, from https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/ CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 129Assumptions that can be made under section 128. (2016). edu.au. Retrieved 24 May 2016, from https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s129.html CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 588MRecovery of compensation for loss resulting from insolvent trading. (2016). edu.au. Retrieved 24 May 2016, from https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s588m.html Corporations Act 2001 reprinted on 1 July 2003 taking into account amendments up to and including those made by Act No. 41, 2003. (2003). Canberra. Corporations Act 2001 reprinted on 16 June 2006 (taking into account amendments up to and including those made by Act No. 17, 2006). (2006). Canberra. Davis, K. (1996). Converting preference shares: An Australian capital structure innovation. Accounting Finance, 36(2), 213-228. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.1996.tb00307.x Gillies, P. (2004). Business law. Sydney: Federation Press. Latimer, P. (1996). Australian business law. North Ryde, N.S.W.: CCH Australia. Law of companies in Australia. (1986). [North Ryde, N.S.W. Pentony, B. Lennard, J. (2000). Business law. Sydney: Butterworths. Symon, H. (2006). Corporations Act 2001. Melbourne: Leo Cussen Institute. Vermeesch, R. Lindgren, K. (1992). Business law of Australia. Sydney: Butterworths.